Huawei Mate 10 review: a smartphone you quickly get used to

Warning

: Use of undefined constant type — assumed 'type' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in
/var/www/u0260287/data/www/superg.ru/wp-content/themes/smart-mag/ functions.php
on line
1493 Warning
: Use of undefined constant url — assumed 'url' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in
/var/www/u0260287/data/www/superg.ru/wp-content /themes/smart-mag/functions.php
on line
1498 Warning
: Use of undefined constant type — assumed 'type' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in
/var/www/u0260287/data/www/ superg.ru/wp-content/themes/smart-mag/functions.php
on line
1501 Warning
: Use of undefined constant color — assumed 'color' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in
/var/www /u0260287/data/www/superg.ru/wp-content/themes/smart-mag/functions.php
on line
1501 Warning
: Use of undefined constant type — assumed 'type' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in
/var/www/u0260287/data/www/superg.ru/wp-content/themes/smart-mag/functions.php
on line
1493 Warning
: Use of undefined constant url — assumed 'url' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in
/var/www/u0260287/data/www/superg.ru/wp-content/themes/smart-mag/functions.php
on line
1498 Warning
: Use of undefined constant type — assumed 'type' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in
/var/www/u0260287/data/www/superg.ru/wp-content/themes/smart-mag/functions.php
on line
1501 Warning
: Use of undefined constant color — assumed 'color' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in
/var/www/u0260287/data/www/superg.ru/wp-content/themes/smart-mag/functions .php
on line
1501 Warning
: Use of undefined constant type — assumed 'type' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in
/var/www/u0260287/data/www/superg.ru/wp-content/ themes/smart-mag/functions.php
on line
1493 Huawei Mate 10 is the flagship from the world's third largest smartphone vendor. It has a Pro version, which is even cooler. Not without reservations, but cooler. A very productive chipset, top-end cameras, a gorgeous display and a cool shell. What more could you want? I'll tell you in the review of Huawei Mate 10 Pro .

Foreign guest

The first thing you need to know about the smartphone is that it is not sold in Russia and, most likely, will not be. Huawei / Honor, in my opinion, has the best pricing policy among all the vendors officially represented in Russia. The company even sells top-end devices at reasonable prices. Take, for example, the Huawei P10, which, even with its controversial design, was and remains one of the best acquisitions among the flagship devices here, with a guarantee and other goodies, because it costs 27 thousand rubles.

Huawei P10

However, any manufacturer earns the least on flagships and putting an affordable price tag on Huawei Mate 10 is not profitable. For this reason, the device did not arrive to us, and its place will be taken by the Honor V10 View on the same platform.

However, no one is stopping you from buying Huawei Mate 10 or its Pro version yourself. Fortunately, the price tags for both modifications are not too steep, and the devices are sold in all online stores known to us: Aliexpress, LightInTheBox, From.ae, and so on.

  • Huawei Mate 10 will cost an average of $650 (you can find it cheaper)
  • Huawei Mate 10 Pro costs about 800 euros, but again there are options

Content:

— Characteristics — Photo capabilities — Video recording — Display — Processor — Performance — Design — Autonomy — The rest — Summary

Specifications Huawei Mate 10 Pro

On October 16, the Chinese company presented three models at once: the regular Mate 10, the Pro version and the special Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design. In the sign below the cut, I indicated in detail how they differ from each other.

Hidden textSelectExpand>
Huawei Mate 10 Mate 10 Pro Mate 10 Porsche Design
Display IPS, 5.9'', resolution 2560 x 1440, 499 ppi, ratio 16:9, contrast 1500:1, brightness 1.8-730 nits, NTSC 96%, HDR10 support OLED, 6 inches, resolution 2160 x 1080 pixels, density 402 ppi, aspect ratio 18:9, contrast ratio 70000:1, NTSC 112%, HDR10 support
CPU Kirin 970 with 8 cores (4x Cortex A53 @ 1.8 GHz + 4x Cortex A73 @ 2.36 GHz) plus i7 coprocessor and NPU
Graphic arts Mali-G72 MP12
RAM 4 GB 4 or 6 GB (about 3.3 GB available) 6 GB
Built-in memory 64 GB 64 or 128 GB (106 GB free) 256 GB
Main cameras 20 MP (monochrome, f/1.6) + 12 MP (RGB, f/1.6), OIS, dual LED flash, 4-phase autofocus, 2x hybrid zoom, 4K recording
Front-camera 8 MP (fixed focus, f/2.0 aperture)
Battery 4,000 mAh with SuperCharge fast charging
Connectors USB Type-C (DisplayPort 1.2 support), 3.5mm audio output USB Type-C (DisplayPort 1.2 support)
Sensors Accelerometer, light and distance sensor, compass, gyroscope, Hall sensor, barometer, IR port, fingerprint scanner
OS Android 8 + proprietary EMIU 8.0 shell
Dimensions 150.5 x 77.8 x 8.2 mm 154.2 x 74.5 x 7.9 mm 154.2 x 74.5 x 7.9 mm
Weight (g) 186 178 178
Wireless interfaces Wi-Fi (802.11 ac), Bluetooth 4.2, NFC, aptX / aptX HD codec transmission, LDAC HD Audio, GPS, Glonass, BDS, IR port
Connection LTE (Single or Dual Nano SIM)
Water and dust protection No Yes Unknown
Colors Mocha (brown), black, gold and rose gold Blue, Grey, Mocha and Rose Gold All black
Prices (in euros) 699 799 1395

I tested the most attractive Huawei Mate 10 Pro model. Attractive from a geek's point of view, but I still can't call it a reasonable choice. Considering the noticeably lower price, it is better to purchase the standard configuration. I’ll tell you why this is as the review progresses.

The Huawei Mate 10 Pro package looks like this:

  • USB <-> USB C cable
  • wired headphones with USB C plug
  • power unit
  • USB C to 3.5 mm adapter
  • Silicone Case

Design and controls

Prev.Next

  • Dimensions : 245.2 x 154.96 x 7.35 mm
  • Weight : 446 grams
  • Body colours: gray
  • Case material: plastic

In terms of its design, the tablet hardly stands out from its analogues - the plastic body of the device is easy to use due to its well-distributed weight (and it doesn’t matter that the tablet weighs almost 450 grams) and rounded sides, thanks to which the corners do not dig into the palms. The back surface is matte, and it will be difficult to notice fingerprints on it, and the tablet does not slip in your hands.

On the top edge, in addition to the volume rocker, there are four microphones, which should provide an excellent level of noise reduction , at least indoors. On the street, you can sometimes hear wind noise when recording video, but the tablet is positioned primarily as the best option for home use and distance learning.

There are also four speakers - two on each side of the device . The declared sound is from Harman/Hardon, which is distinguished not only by high volume and good stereo effect, but also by high quality. This is the case when speakers can really replace small portable speakers - the sound is excellent both in games and when listening to music.

On the right side frame, if you look closely, you can see a light sensor that regulates not only the backlight brightness level depending on the external lighting, but also the color temperature . I note that this setting can be completely disabled if necessary.

Prev.Next

Just to the right of the camera there is a fairly bright LED event indicator , which lights up in red, white and green depending on the charge level.

For charging, a modern Type-C port is used , to which, in the absence of a 3.5 mm jack, wired headphones can also be connected. The package already includes an adapter from Type-C to 3.5 mm.

The card tray allows you to connect only one nano SIM card , but you can additionally install a microSD memory card, which will be important for some users, given that 64 GB of built-in storage is not always enough in modern realities.

The unit with the camera and flash on the back of the tablet protrudes , so without using a case, the risk of scratching the module increases.

Photo capabilities

The reputable portal DxOMark placed our hero in third place in terms of camera capabilities. Only two smartphones beat it: the inaccessible Google Pixel 2 and the iPhone X. Let's see if the Mate 10 Pro is worthy of the bronze it received?..

Front-camera

8 megapixel, fixed focus, f/2.0 aperture - everything is in order here. But shooting with the front camera still cannot be called a breakthrough. Selfies turn out to be of high quality, solid, but not better.

Despite one front module, the camera can blur the background. She does this programmatically and not very well.

And yes, there is no wide-angle shooting function like in the P10.

Main cameras

The Mate 10 Pro has one of the best on the market. However, during testing, a whole bunch of nuances were found.

Personally, the Huawei Mate 10 Pro camera surprised me next.

I liked the way the Mate 10 Pro shoots at night much more than during the day.

In the latter case, the algorithms tightly suppress all the detail of the image, accordingly, it is better not to zoom in on it.

Pay attention to the comparison shots below, in which the OnePlus 5T camera (always on the right) beats our hero.

But at night, ten take simply excellent pictures. It's hard to believe that these shots were taken with a smartphone.

We immediately compare our hero with OnePlus 5T and get a complete fiasco of the latter.

However, as soon as we switch smartphones to special shooting modes (Mate 10 Pro in night mode, and 1+5T in Pro, because it does not have a night mode), we get a completely different picture.

Modern smartphones have such a wonderful thing - automatic HDR. It is useful when the user does not understand whether HDR should be enabled for a particular scene or not. Unfortunately, Auto HDR is still not implemented in Huawei smartphones. There are only ON and OFF, and the switch is not at hand - you need to go into the camera menu.

In any case, the HDR mode is quite good. However, it is far from Google's HDR+.

No HDR

With HDR

bokeh

Of course, the smartphone can blur the background. However, he does not always do this efficiently. About 1 picture out of 5 turns out beautiful. On the rest, errors occur: sometimes the automation will cut off part of the hair, sometimes it won’t recognize a piece of the background and will move it to the foreground.

In general, algorithms still have a lot to learn.

Hybrid zoom

It’s great that Huawei didn’t lie and call this option “optical zoom.” The fact is that here both modules received the same lenses - 27 mm with f/1.6 aperture. There is no telephoto lens here, so any approach to the object is accompanied by a serious loss in quality. You should forget about this function once and for all.

Monochrome

The second camera of the Huawei Mate 10 Pro has a resolution of 20 megapixels versus 12 megapixels in the main one. In addition, the sensor only captures black and white images.

Why this is not necessary, I find it difficult to answer, because there is no special advantage here. Below are a couple of 100% crops from two photos: on the left, a frame was taken at a resolution of 12 megapixels on an RGB module, and on the right, a 20 megapixel photo taken on a monochrome sensor.

And as for me, the main camera takes pictures with much more detail.

By the way, we take all the photo examples in one archive from here.

Video recording

The clear king of video shooting is the iPhone 8 and X. Still, it’s very difficult to compete with 4K at 60 frames per second and such quality of content (over 100 Mbit/s).

Against this background, all Android smartphones are outsiders, but Huawei Mate 10 Pro can still do something. 4K video turns out to be quite pleasant: there is good sharpness, smoothness of the picture, and the quality of the content in general is pleasing.

Optical stabilization only works when shooting Full HD videos, and even then, it does not stabilize the image very well - when you shoot on the go, a terrible “jelly” catches your eye.

Few smartphones on Android are capable of stabilizing the picture more or less tolerably. The exception is LG V30+ or ​​Asus Zenfone 4.

Review of the 10.8-inch Huawei MatePad Pro tablet

The tablet market has been in approximately the same state for several years now: there are no breakthroughs here, the leader - Apple - has not changed, but several of its competitors regularly release new products that are in many ways not inferior to Apple flagships, but are sold much cheaper. So the new second-generation iPad Pro has something to compare with: Huawei MatePad Pro is positioned as a direct competitor to the 11-inch version of iPad Pro, but taking into account discounts on the official Huawei website, it costs almost half as much. Let's figure out why it is better and why it is worse than the iPad Pro we recently tested.

At the time of publication of the review, a model with a memory capacity of 128 GB and without an LTE module could be purchased in the Huawei online store for 38 thousand rubles (43 thousand with the M-pencil stylus or with the Smart Magnetic Keyboard cover). The second generation iPad Pro in a similar configuration costs 70 thousand on the official Apple website; if you want to equip the iPad Pro with a stylus, you will have to pay another 11.5 thousand, and the keyboard cover will cost even more. How justified is this price difference?

Specifications

First, let's look at the technical characteristics of both models.

Huawei MatePad ProiPad Pro 11″ second generation (2020)
ScreenIPS, 10.8″, 2560×1600 (279 ppi)IPS, 11″, 2388×1668 (264 ppi)
SoC (processor)Huawei Kirin 990 (8 cores, 2+2+4, maximum frequency 2.86 GHz)Apple A12Z Bionic (8 cores, 4+4, maximum frequency 2.49 GHz)
Flash memory128 GB128 / 256 / 512 GB / 1 TB
Memory card supportyes (NM standard, up to 256 GB)via third-party USB-C adapters
ConnectorsUSB-C with external storage supportUSB-C with external storage support
Camerasfront (8 MP, 1080p video) and rear (13 MP, ƒ/1.8, 4K video shooting)front (7 MP, 1080p video via FaceTime) and two rear (wide-angle 12 MP ƒ/1.8 and ultra-wide-angle 10 MP ƒ/2.4, 4K video shooting on all, stabilization in 1080p and 720p modes)
InternetWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax MIMO (2.4 + 5 GHz), optional LTEWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax MIMO (2.4 + 5 GHz), optional LTE
Scannersface recognitionFace ID (facial recognition), LiDAR (3D interior scanning)
Keyboard cover and stylus supportThere isThere is
Battery7250 mAh7540 mAh (unofficial information)
Dimensions246×159×7.2 mm248×179×5.9 mm
Weight of version without LTE460 g471 g
Retail offers for version without LTE, 128 GB of memory find out the price find out the price
Retail offers for version with LTE, 128 GB of memory find out the price find out the price

As we can see, from this table it is quite difficult to draw any clear conclusions about the superiority of one or another model. In most characteristics they are very similar, and those differences that exist do not in themselves say much. For example, what is better - the ability to choose a larger amount of built-in flash memory or support for memory cards of the atypical NM format? SoC Huawei Kirin 990 or Apple A12Z Bionic? Finally, less weight (by 11 g) or less thickness (by 1.3 mm)?

We will try to answer these questions in our testing.

Packaging and equipment

The tablet comes in a predominantly white box. It looks good, but not as stylish as Apple products. Along with the tablet, we also received the M-pencil stylus. Its packaging evokes a similar feeling.

Inside the box with the tablet, a 5 V 2 A charger was found, which also supports fast charging (9 V 2 A), a USB-C cable, a key for removing the memory card tray and SIM card, as well as (and thanks for this !) adapter from USB-C to mini-jack (3.5 mm).

In general, despite the fact that there is nothing out of the ordinary here, the kit should be considered successful: both the adapter and the fast charger are evidence of the manufacturer’s care for its users.

Since the stylus comes as a gift with the tablet, it can be considered part of the package, so let's look at it too.

The box contains the stylus itself, a replacement tip and leaflets. The stylus is made of plastic and fits quite comfortably in the hand.

Design

The appearance of the tablet is strict and minimalistic. Like the iPad Pro, the thickness of the frame is the same on all sides of the screen, but the frame itself is significantly narrower: about half. It looks great, of course.

However, due to the narrowness of the frame, the front camera had to be moved to the main space of the screen. It turns out that there is a small hole right in the image itself. It’s difficult to say which option is better - when the peephole is hidden, but the frame is wider, or like this. In any case, Huawei's solution is not without grace.

Of course, there are no buttons on the front surface - the tablet is a flagship one. Therefore, instead of a fingerprint scanner, facial recognition is used, which, apparently, is assigned to the same front camera (while the iPad Pro has a separate module for this - Face ID).

Note that the initial facial scan is slower and less smooth than on the iPad and iPhone, but there were no further problems with recognition.

The edges are made of plastic and rounded. The buttons are located on the left and top sides: power on/off and volume rocker, respectively.

On the right is a USB-C connector, and at the bottom is a slot for Nano-SIM and memory cards of the NM (Nano Memory) standard, which for some reason is used by Huawei instead of microSD. I must say, this is a very dubious innovation. At the time of writing, both the official online store of the manufacturer and large resellers did not have such cards in stock (everywhere it said: the product is sold out). In addition, the price of such a card was almost 6,000 rubles for 128 GB at a speed of 90 MB/s. For comparison, microSD cards with the same capacity and an adapter to SD can now be bought for 2000-3000 rubles, and their speed will be 100 MB/s (UHS-I Class 3).

The sound part is of particular interest. Firstly, there are Harman Kardon stereo speakers - two each on the left and right sides. The sound is quite spacious and clear, although it still lacks depth. This is one of the best and loudest tablets we've ever tested.

Secondly, there are already four microphones here - they are located along the top edge at the same distance from each other.

And thirdly (this is not a plus, but a minus), there is no 3.5 mm jack for connecting headphones. Which, of course, is sad. Apparently, this decision is due to the desire for a minimum thickness of the case, although it is still slightly thicker than the iPad Pro: 7.2 versus 5.9 mm.

The entire back surface is covered with a plastic cover, the matte surface of which, however, looks very noble. The single camera, flash and microphone are located on a strongly protruding block. But it is quite compact, and this should not cause any major inconvenience.

Screen

The tablet display has a diagonal of 10.8 inches and a resolution of 2560×1600. This results in an even slightly higher pixel density than on the 11-inch iPad Pro. However, as we know, the quality of the screen is determined not only by this parameter.

The front surface of the screen is made in the form of a glass plate with a mirror-smooth surface that is scratch-resistant. Judging by the reflection of objects, the anti-glare properties of the screen are slightly better than those of the Google Nexus 7 (2013) screen (hereinafter simply Nexus 7). For clarity, here is a photo in which a white surface is reflected when the screens are turned off (on the left is Huawei MatePad Pro, on the right is Nexus 7, then they can be distinguished by size):

The screen of the Huawei MatePad Pro is slightly darker (brightness according to photographs is 109 versus 111 for the Nexus 7). The ghosting of reflected objects in the Huawei MatePad Pro screen is very weak, this indicates that there is no air gap between the layers of the screen (more specifically, between the outer glass and the surface of the LCD matrix) (OGS - One Glass Solution type screen). Due to the smaller number of boundaries (glass/air type) with very different refractive indices, such screens look better in conditions of intense external illumination, but their repair in the case of cracked external glass is much more expensive, since the entire screen has to be replaced. On the outer surface of the screen there is a special oleophobic (grease-repellent) coating, which is better in efficiency than that of the Nexus 7, so fingerprints are removed much easier and appear at a lower speed than in the case of regular glass.

When displaying the white field in full screen and manually controlling the brightness, its maximum value was 460 cd/m² under normal conditions, but in very bright light in automatic mode it rises to 540 cd/m². The maximum brightness is very high, therefore, given the excellent anti-glare properties, screen readability even on a sunny day outdoors should be at a good level. The minimum brightness value is 2.3 cd/m². In complete darkness, the brightness can be reduced to a comfortable value. There is automatic brightness adjustment based on the light sensor (it is located on the upper edge of the front panel close to the left corner in landscape orientation). In automatic mode, as external lighting conditions change, the screen brightness both increases and decreases. The operation of this function depends on the position of the brightness adjustment slider: with it the user can try to set the desired brightness level in the current conditions. If you leave everything at default, then in complete darkness the auto-brightness function reduces the brightness to 3 cd/m² (very dark), in an office illuminated by artificial light (approximately 550 lux) it sets it to 260 cd/m² (normal), in a very bright environment ( conditionally corresponds to being in direct sunlight) increases to 540 cd/m² (to the maximum, as needed). We were not entirely satisfied with the result, so we slightly increased the brightness in complete darkness, ultimately obtaining the following values ​​for the three conditions indicated above: 10, 275, 540 cd/m² (excellent). It turns out that the auto-brightness function works adequately and allows you to customize your work to individual requirements.

This tablet uses an IPS matrix. The microphotographs show a typical IPS subpixel structure:

For comparison, you can see the gallery of microphotographs of screens used in mobile technology.

The screen has good viewing angles without significant color shift even with large viewing deviations from perpendicular to the screen and without inverting shades. For comparison, here are photographs in which the same images are displayed on the screens of Huawei MatePad Pro and Nexus 7, while the screen brightness is initially set to approximately 200 cd/m², and the color balance on the camera is forced to switch to 6500 K.

There is a white field perpendicular to the screens:

Note the good uniformity of brightness and color tone of the white field.

And a test picture:

The colors on the Huawei MatePad Pro screen are clearly oversaturated, and the color balance varies greatly between screens. Let us remind you that the photograph cannot serve as a reliable source of information about the quality of color rendering and is provided only for conditional visual illustration. The reason is that the spectral sensitivity of the camera sensor does not exactly match this characteristic of human vision.

Now at an angle of approximately 45 degrees to the plane and to the side of the screen:

It can be seen that the colors have not changed much on both screens, but on the Huawei MatePad Pro the contrast has decreased to a greater extent due to the greater highlighting of blacks.

And a white field:

The brightness at an angle of the screens has decreased (by at least 4 times, based on the difference in shutter speed), but the Huawei MatePad Pro's screen at this angle is slightly brighter. When deviated diagonally, the black field brightens greatly and acquires a slightly reddish tint. The photographs below demonstrate this (the brightness of the white areas in the direction perpendicular to the plane of the screens is the same!):

And from another angle:

When viewed perpendicularly, the uniformity of the black field is average, since closer to the edges the screen brightens a little in places:

The contrast (approximately in the center of the screen) is high - about 1200:1. The response time for the black-white-black transition is 20 ms (10 ms on + 10 ms off). The transition between halftones of gray 25% and 75% (based on the numerical value of the color) and back takes a total of 34 ms. The gamma curve, constructed using 32 points with equal intervals based on the numerical value of the shade of gray, did not reveal any blockage in either the highlights or the shadows. The exponent of the approximating power function is 2.09, which is slightly lower than the standard value of 2.2. In this case, the real gamma curve noticeably deviates from the power-law dependence:

This is due to the fact that this device has a dynamic adjustment of the backlight brightness with an unobvious dependence on time and on the nature of the displayed image. As a result, the resulting dependence of brightness on hue (gamma curve) may not correspond to the gamma curve of a static image, since the measurements were carried out with sequential display of shades of gray on almost the entire screen. For this reason, we carried out a number of tests - determining contrast and response time, comparing black illumination at angles - (however, as always) when displaying special templates with a constant average brightness, and not monochromatic fields in the entire screen. In general, such non-disabled brightness correction does nothing but harm, since constantly changing the screen brightness can at least cause some discomfort.

The color gamut is wider than sRGB and almost equal to DCI:

Let's look at the spectra:

The spectra of the components are quite well separated, which determines the wide color gamut. For a consumer device, a wide color gamut is a disadvantage because it results in unnaturally saturated colors in images—drawings, photographs, and movies—that are oriented to the sRGB space (which is the vast majority of them). This is especially noticeable on recognizable shades, such as skin tones. The result is shown in the photographs above.

However, not everything is so bad: when you select the Normal , the coverage is compressed to the sRGB boundaries.

Colors in images become less saturated (and color balance changes slightly):

The balance of shades on the gray scale after selecting the Usual is a compromise, since the color temperature is significantly higher than the standard 6500 K (about 8200 K on a white field), but the deviation from the blackbody spectrum (ΔE) is about 2 (also on white), which even for professional device is considered an excellent indicator.

This device has the ability to adjust the color balance by adjusting the hue on the color wheel or simply by selecting one of three preset profiles.

In the graphs below, the curves correspond to the results obtained after selecting the Normal and manual color balance correction (the point on the correction circle is like in the picture above). (The darkest areas of the gray scale can be ignored, since color balance there is not very important, and the error in measuring color characteristics at low brightness is large.)

It can be seen that the change in balance corresponds to the expected result, since ΔE decreased and the color temperature approached the standard 6500 K. There is some benefit from such a correction, although the correction range was not enough to reduce the color temperature to 6500 K. Note that this function implemented in this version rather for show, since there is no numerical reflection of the correction and there is no special field for measuring color balance.

There is a fancy setting that allows you to reduce the intensity of the blue component.

Marketers tried to intimidate the user in order to show the level of care of the manufacturer. Of course, there is no UV radiation (see spectrum above), and there is no eye fatigue caused specifically by blue light. In principle, bright light can lead to disruption of the circadian rhythm (see the article about the iPad Pro with a 9.7-inch display), but everything can be solved by adjusting the brightness to a comfortable level, and there is absolutely no way to distort the color balance, reducing the contribution of blue sense.

There is a function Natural tone , which, if enabled, adjusts the color balance to environmental conditions.

For example, we activated it and placed the tablet under LED lamps with cool white light, resulting in values ​​of 3.4 for ΔE and 8000 K for color temperature. Under a halogen incandescent lamp (warm light) - 2.8 and 6780 K, that is, the color temperature has become lower. The function works as expected. Note that the current standard is to calibrate display devices to a white point of 6500 K, but in principle, correction for the color temperature of external light can be useful if you want to achieve a better match between the image on the screen and what is visible on paper (or any other device). a medium on which colors are formed by the reflection of incident light) under current conditions.

To summarize: the screen has a very high maximum brightness (540 cd/m²) and has excellent anti-glare properties, so the device can be used outdoors without any problems, even on a sunny summer day. In complete darkness, the brightness can be reduced to a comfortable level (up to 2.3 cd/m²). It is also possible to use a mode with automatic brightness adjustment, which works adequately. Also, the advantages of the screen include an effective oleophobic coating, the absence of air gaps in the layers of the screen and flickering, high contrast (1200:1), sRGB color gamut and good color balance (when choosing the right profile and after a small correction). The disadvantages are the low stability of black to the deviation of the gaze from perpendicular to the screen plane. Considering the importance of characteristics for this particular class of devices, the quality of the screen can be considered very high.

Performance

The tablet runs on Huawei's own SoC - Kirin 990. Interestingly, the data from the CPU-Z utility that we installed on the MatePad Pro and on Huawei's official website about this chip are slightly different. The SoC is stated to use two Cortex-A76 cores @ 2.86 GHz, two Cortex-A76 cores @ 2.09 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores @ 1.8 GHz. CPU-Z describes the configuration differently: four Cortex-A55 cores @ 2.86 GHz and four unspecified 1.86 GHz processor cores.

The GPU here is a 16-core Mali-G76 with a frequency of 600 MHz. The tablet is also said to have a “dual neural processor.” The amount of RAM is 6 GB (5.7 GB according to the CPU-Z version).

Well, let's test the model and compare it with the iPad Pro. Let's start with browser tests: SunSpider 1.0.2, Octane Benchmark, Kraken Benchmark and JetStream 2 (note that we are now using the second version of JetStream). All tests on the iPad Pro were performed in Safari on the current version of iPadOS: 13.4; on the MatePad Pro we used Chrome. Results were rounded to whole numbers.

Huawei MatePad Pro (Huawei Kirin 990)Apple iPad Pro 11″ (2020) (Apple A12Z Bionic)
SunSpider 1.0.2 (ms, less is better)434124
Octane 2.0 (points, more is better)2176642699
Kraken Benchmark 1.1 (ms, lower is better)2761658
JetStream 1.1 (points, more is better)55274

Well, the picture is clear: in browser benchmarks, the Huawei tablet shows results several times lower than the iPad Pro.

Now let's see how the tablets perform in Geekbench 5 - a multi-platform benchmark that measures the performance of the CPU and RAM, and from the fourth version - also the computing capabilities of the GPU). Plus, we haven’t forgotten about the comprehensive AnTuTu Benchmark.

Huawei MatePad Pro (Huawei Kirin 990)Apple iPad Pro 11″ (2018) (Apple A12X Bionic)
Geekbench 5 Single-Core Score (scores, higher is better)7601110
Geekbench 5 Multi-Core Score (scores, higher is better)29204632
Geekbench 5 Compute (scores, higher is better)35649290
AnTuTu Benchmark (scores, more is better)461860561107

Here the gap is not so great, but it is still undoubtedly there. Judging by Geekbench processor tests - about one and a half times, judging by AnTuTu - about one fifth. But the results of calculations using GPU (OpenCL) from Huawei are much worse - almost three times.

However, this is a more exotic scenario for using the GPU in a mobile device than 3D games. To check their performance, we use multi-platform 3DMark. We are interested in the Sling Shot Extreme mode (results in points).

Huawei MatePad Pro (Huawei Kirin 990)Apple iPad Pro 11″ (2020) (Apple A12Z Bionic)
3DMark (Sling Shot Extreme mode)56936795

There is again a lag from the iPad Pro, but not as critical - as in AnTuTu, about one fifth.

In general, the picture is clear. Despite the fact that the maximum CPU frequencies in the Huawei SoC are higher than in the Apple SoC, it is the processor performance that is undoubtedly better in the iPad Pro. In games, the difference will not be so great, although here the MatePad Pro lags behind the leader.

Playing video

This device supports DisplayPort Alt Mode for USB Type-C - outputs image and sound to an external device when connected to a USB port (usbview.exe program report). We tested operation in this mode together with the Dell DA200 adapter. When connected to our monitor, video output is in 1080p mode at 60 Hz frame rate. There is only one operating mode - simple copying of the tablet screen; for some reason there is no alternative desktop output mode, although even the MediaPad M6 10.8 has it. There is a desktop mode on the tablet itself, but when connected to a monitor, the same simple copying of the tablet screen is performed.

When the tablet screen is in portrait orientation, the picture on the Full HD monitor is displayed inscribed in height and with wide black margins on the sides, and in landscape orientation - inscribed in width with narrow black margins at the top and bottom. There is no point-to-point output in both options. Note that simultaneously with image and sound output, you can connect a mouse and keyboard, USB flash drives, etc. to the tablet via USB, turning the tablet into a basis for a workstation, but for this, an adapter or monitor (with a USB Type-C input) must allow the connection of external USB devices (that is, have a USB hub). Connection to a wired network (1 Gbps) is also supported. To charge the tablet, you will need to connect a charger to the adapter/dock, and monitors with a USB Type-C input usually supply power to the tablet themselves.

To test the output of video files on the screen of the device itself, we used a set of test files with an arrow and a rectangle moving one division per frame (see “Method for testing video playback and display devices. Version 1 (for mobile devices)”). Screenshots with a shutter speed of 1 s helped determine the nature of the output of frames of video files with various parameters: the resolution varied (1280 by 720 (720p), 1920 by 1080 (1080p) and 3840 by 2160 (4K) pixels) and frame rate (24, 25, 30, 50 and 60 fps). In the tests we used the MX Player video player in the “Hardware” mode. The test results are summarized in the table:

FileUniformityPasses
4K/60p (H.265)GreatNo
4K/50p (H.265)GreatNo
4K/30p (H.265)GreatNo
4K/25p (H.265)GreatNo
4K/24p (H.265)GreatNo
4K/30pGreatNo
4K/25pGreatNo
4K/24pGreatNo
1080/60pGreatNo
1080/50pGreatNo
1080/30pGreatNo
1080/25pGreatNo
1080/24pGreatNo
720/60pGreatNo
720/50pGreatNo
720/30pGreatNo
720/25pGreatNo
720/24pGreatNo

Note: If both columns Uniformity and Skips have green ratings, this means that, most likely, when watching films, artifacts caused by uneven alternation and skipping of frames will either not be visible at all, or their number and visibility will not affect comfort viewing. Red marks indicate possible problems with playback of the corresponding files.

According to the criterion of frame output, the quality of playback of video files on the screen of the tablet itself is very good, since frames (or groups of frames) can (but are not required) be output with uniform alternation of intervals and without skipping frames. We note the good stability of these results; this is rare for Android tablets. When playing video files with a resolution of 1920 by 1080 pixels (1080p), the image of the video file itself is displayed exactly across the width of the screen, black bars are displayed at the top and bottom, and the hole in the screen does not enter the image output area, which somehow compensates for the presence of this hole.

The picture clarity is high, but not ideal, since there is no escape from interpolation to the screen resolution. However, for the sake of experimentation, you can switch to the one-to-one pixel mode; there will be no interpolation. The brightness range displayed on the screen corresponds to the standard range of 16-235: all gradations of shades are displayed in shadows and highlights. Note that this tablet has hardware decoding support for H.265 files with a color depth of 10 bits per color, while gradients are output to the screen with better quality than in the case of 8-bit files (however, this is not proof of true 10-bit output). Display of HDR files (HDR10, HEVC) is also supported.

Operating system and software

The tablet runs on Android 10.0 with Huawei's own EMUI 10.0.1 shell.

The Google Play store, as well as other Google services, is not here - everyone has heard about this, and we have repeatedly written in reviews of smartphones about the existing problem, but, alas, it is impossible not to repeat it. The problem, of course, is political, not technological, so it makes no sense to scold the manufacturer. You just have to keep this in mind. As an alternative, the tablet uses its own AppGallery store, and, in principle, a “gentleman’s” set of software for Android is presented there. For the rest, you can use installation from APK files or look for other stores. However, this does not always work with games.

Among the preinstalled software, I would like to draw your attention to applications for working with the stylus. By the way, it connects as easily as an Apple Pencil to an iPad Pro, and is no less convenient to use. In particular, it recognizes pressure and tilt angle. Perhaps artists or professional designers will have a different opinion; we are simply talking about the sensations from notes and amateur “handwriting”.

So, in addition to the standard notepad, there are two more advanced applications for the stylus: Nebo for Huawei and MyScript Calculator 2. The first of them is designed for notes with advanced editing capabilities. For example, you can cross out some text (and it will disappear), apply different formatting for handwritten lines, etc.

As for the MyScript Calculator 2 application, it will certainly be of interest to anyone who needs to work with mathematical formulas. The tablet recognizes and converts hand-drawn special characters into printed form, so writing complex formulas for a scientific article, report or abstract can become much easier. In addition, MyScript Calculator 2 can be used as a manual calculator. The screenshots below show what we wrote and displayed by the program.

Autonomous operation and heating

The tablet is equipped with a non-removable 7250 mAh battery, which is slightly smaller than the iPad Pro. However, what is more important is not even the nominal value, but how energy efficient the device is. Based on the results of testing using our method, it turns out that the Huawei MatePad Pro runs on battery for about the same amount of time as an Apple device.

Huawei MatePad Pro (Huawei Kirin 990)Apple iPad Pro 11″ (2020) (Apple A12Z Bionic)
Watching online videos from YouTube (720p, brightness 100 cd/m²)9 hours 15 minutes10 hours 35 minutes
Reading mode (brightness 100 cd/m²)about 22 o'clockabout 22 o'clock

There is a lag in video viewing mode, while in reading mode the result is almost identical. In general, we can state that the situation with autonomy here is quite normal.

Below is a thermal image of the rear surface taken after 15 minutes of fighting a gorilla in Injustice 2:

The highest heating is near the USB input, where, apparently, the charging controller is located (the tablet was charging during the test). The second high heating area is located closer to the upper left corner (if you turn the tablet with the screen towards the user) - most likely it corresponds to the location of the SoC chip. According to the heat camera, the maximum heating in this area was only 34 degrees (at an ambient temperature of 24 degrees), which is relatively little.

When exposed to bright sun for a long time, the tablet overheats and a notification appears on the screen. However, the situation is the same with the iPad Pro.

Camera

The Huawei MatePad Pro tablet, unlike the new iPad Pro, has only one rear camera, but its resolution is 1 megapixel higher - 13 megapixels versus 12 megapixels for Apple's flagship. The lens aperture is the same: ƒ/1.8. In both cases, 4K video shooting is supported. We decided to compare both cameras head-to-head. Below are frames taken almost simultaneously with the main cameras of the devices: on the left - Huawei MatePad Pro, on the right - Apple iPad Pro (2020) . The originals are available by clicking, but do not pay attention to the different dates in Exif - apparently, the Huawei tablet received incorrect information from the operating system, where the date and time were not set correctly.

It can be seen that the iPad photo turned out lighter. In reality, the color is more correct on Huawei. But, say, in the pre-sunset time, the iPad Pro approach may be better. In addition, the MatePad Pro has a stronger bokeh effect. But overall, there is a feeling that the iPad Pro has a sharper picture.

Shooting against the light, in the pre-sunset time.:) An interesting result: subjectively, if you don’t zoom in, the iPad Pro has a slightly more beautiful picture, with more interesting colors. But once you look at the photo in full screen (at actual size), the noisiness of the frame taken on an Apple tablet becomes obvious. Pay attention to the crown of the light tree at the bottom left - on the iPad this is already some kind of post-impressionism. The situation is much better on the MatePad Pro.

And again the iPad Pro highlights the frame. But something else is interesting: we made six takes on a Huawei tablet, and in none of them were we able to get all the flowers clear. On some, two or three were blurred, on others, all of them. Whereas on the iPad Pro, with the same number of attempts, complete success was achieved in two cases, and in the rest, one or at most two flowers were blurred.

Here, of course, the winner is obvious. The sky color is correct on the right. And overall the picture looks much more beautiful and noble.

And now - a test for working with small parts. But it is very difficult to make a verdict. However, here both tablets were already highlighting the frame. And the next couple of pictures are the same view, but with the brightness artificially reduced so that it matches the real picture of the pre-sunset forest.

Again, we will refrain from drawing a definitive conclusion, but note that when viewed in real size, the picture on the iPad Pro looks a little better. Compare, for example, the two tree trunks on the right in the middle ground. However, in miniature it is the Huawei photo that is more advantageous - due to the more dramatic light (this is not only a spot of light on the ground, but also reflections on the bush on the right).

To summarize, in terms of photo quality, we would still give the palm to Apple, if only because out of six photos Huawei took, two turned out to be unsuccessful, while the competitor’s were all decent. But if we compare those scenes where both devices felt comfortable, it’s difficult to clearly choose a winner.

At the same time, the iPad Pro shoots in the HEIC format, which gives a much smaller file size with the same quality (the difference is on average one and a half times), but the JPEG format used in the Huawei tablet still remains more universal.

When it comes to shooting video, we tend to prefer the iPad Pro. Judging by the fact that in the Huawei video there is noticeable shaking of objects and problems with refocusing, and the file with a timing of 30 seconds and a resolution of 4K 30 fps takes up only 111 MB, while the Apple video takes 262.7 MB (with the same parameters) , The MatePad Pro simply shoots with a much lower bitrate.

conclusions

Despite all the noted shortcomings - the lack of Google services, imperfect camera performance, a non-standard memory card format (NM instead of microSD), lower performance - we must admit that Huawei has turned out to be a very decent tablet. Among its trump cards are its beautiful appearance, excellent screen and sound, full-fledged work with a stylus... And most importantly, of course, the price: not only is the device itself more than one and a half times cheaper than its main competitor, but also the accessories are much cheaper.

Yes, there may not be any advanced things like lidar or an ultra-wide-angle rear camera. But are they really necessary and is it worth overpaying for it? The question is. The iPad Pro remains the leader, but the Huawei MatePad Pro is a completely worthy alternative, significantly ahead of its American competitor in terms of price and capabilities.

Display

Huawei Mate 10 has a regular IPS matrix. The advanced version received an OLED panel. And while I love the natural colors of IPS, OLED in stock is simply excellent.

6 inches (in the usual ten 5.9), FullHD+ resolution (2160 x 1080 pixels, 402 ppi), aspect ratio 18:9, thin frames, 112% compliance with the NTSC palette, contrast 70,000:1, ideal oleophobic coating (according to comes with a high-quality protective film by default), HDR10 support - what more could you want from a screen in 2018?

At the maximum angle, the matrix turns slightly green, but this is a standard feature for any OLED panel. The main thing is the perfect display of black and rich colors of the inflections.

Among all these advantages, I found only one disadvantage, or rather, a nuance. These are the sharp corners of the screen. All new flagships come with slightly rounded corners so that they fit neatly into the exterior of the smartphone. But that's not the case with the Mate 10 Pro.

In the older version, the screen is 18:9 (in the usual 16:9), therefore, there was no place for a fingerprint scanner on the front panel. The sensor has moved back, which is not very convenient. However, the sensor is very fast, recognizes fingerprints without errors, and can also be used as an additional navigation panel in the menu, Gallery or for taking selfies - this is convenient.

My impressions of using a smartphone

After receiving my order, I realized that I made the right choice!!! The design, sound, photo and video quality are wonderful. I was very pleased with the main camera - there are two of them, color and black and white, because... I travel a lot and want to save all the unforgettable moments and incredible landscapes not only in my memory, but also in my smartphone.

The Huawei Mate 10 Pro smartphone is equipped with a display on which the image is clearly visible from any angle, which is very convenient in a large company if you want to show something interesting on your smartphone. Screen resolution 2160 × 1080. You can also work with gloves.

A very cool feature - you can connect your smartphone to a TV or monitor via HDMI and you get a full-fledged computer, connect a mouse or gamepad and you get a cool Android console.

The battery is super, with average use it lasts for 2 days. Another very necessary ability is fast charging; in half an hour you can charge the battery by more than 50%, which is very convenient when you go to a cafe for coffee, and during this time your smartphone is in full combat readiness.

As for the lack of support for a microSD memory card in the Huawei Mate 10 Pro, this is not a particular problem, since the built-in memory is 128 GB.

I would like to warn you right away about the size – the device is not small, but it is very comfortable to hold in your hand. The glass back panel with a mirror backing, on the one hand, can be said to be not very practical to use, but the manufacturers of Huawei Mate 10 Pro have provided for this, so a transparent silicone case is included in the package.

Huawei Mate 10 Pro is the first smartphone to use artificial intelligence, this is very noticeable when using the camera, it automatically adjusts the optimal shooting parameters that will best suit the subject and lighting conditions.

Also a very useful feature in a smartphone is a built-in translator, this is an ideal option for me, I travel a lot around the world. I downloaded the database of relevant languages, and everything works even without an Internet connection.

Another very nice feature of this smartphone is its moisture resistance. Having been caught in the rain and talking at the same time, he remained absolutely undamaged.

CPU

The third feature is the latest chipset of its own production, Kirin 970. The “Stone” received 8 cores, a maximum frequency of 2.36 GHz, and a Mali G72 MP12 graphics accelerator, but all this is not so interesting.

The key feature of the new SoC is a neuro-computing unit with machine learning function - NPU or Neural-network Processing Unit.

It, along with the CPU and GPU, can perform complex and extraordinary calculations, for example, process thousands of photographs in a very short time - 2,000 pieces in 1 minute. What is meant by “process” is not explained. However, as well as why this NPU is needed at all. It seems to me that it was important for Huawei to be the first to create a development, and it was decided to postpone understanding why it was needed until later. As was once the case with the Force Touch function in Huawei Mate S (2015).

At the moment, NPU manifests itself in the following. The Gallery has a special “Browse” tab, where photos are sorted into categories: people, places, food, and so on. However, at what point the photo processing occurs, I still don’t understand. I walked around the center of Moscow, took several dozen photos with friends, three hours later I went to the “Review” tab, and no new photos appeared there. You cannot manually start the processing process.

I went to the Gallery the very next day - all the latest photos were sorted into categories. It’s hard to say how it all works.

As a result, we have that at the moment there is no really useful use of NPU.

Oh yes! Another cool feature of the proprietary chipset is LTE Cat. 18. In other words, the smartphone is capable of downloading data at a speed of 1.2 Gb/s. If you find networks with such speeds, please chime in the comments.

Performance

The Mali G72 MP12 is responsible for the graphic power. Unfortunately, in “Tanks” at the peak settings there are drops of up to 50 FPS, which has never happened with the Adreno 540. There is a clear loss to its main competitor from Qualcomm.

In the same NotebookCheck rating, the graphics lag behind the Adreno 540 and even its multi-core brother, the Mali G71 MP20 (installed in all Galaxy flagships from Samsung).

Another unpleasant thing is that the processor itself is very throttled.

During the fifth performance test in AnTuTu in a row, the results began to drop rapidly, and the smartphone seriously heated up to 50 degrees.

The conclusion is simple - Huawei Mate 10 Pro is not very suitable for advanced mobile gamers.

Screen

The screen of the Mate 10 Pro version is not only located almost edge to edge, but also has an aspect ratio of 18:9 or, to put it simply, 2:1. Thus, we see that this aspect ratio has no longer become a whim of one or two manufacturers, but a real trend that most major players in the market are trying to adhere to.

The screen diagonal will be 6 inches, and it will be made using AMOLED technology. Combined with HDR support, it makes a really nice impression.

The screen of the younger version of Mate 10 has a diagonal of 5.9 inches and a resolution of 2K. But at the same time, its brightness will be 30% higher than in the Mate 9, and will be 730 nits.

In addition, the display of the new product is multi-layered, which should provide better image quality. One of the layers will be Gorilla Glass, but this “pie” also includes a UV filter.

Design

In short, the Huawei Mate 10 Pro is a flagship both inside and out.

All elements of the case fit together perfectly. Tempered glass of unknown origin on the front and back.

The device feels just great in the hand. The new 18:9 screen proportions have an effect - the smartphone is noticeably elongated in height, so you get the impression that you are using a regular 5.5-inch device.

Length Width Thickness Weight
Huawei Mate 10 (5.9'') 150,5 77,8 8,2 186
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (6'') 154,2 74,5 7,9 178
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (6.3'') 162,5 74,8 8,6 195
iPhone X (5.8'') 143,6 70,9 7,7 174

The only negative in terms of ergonomics is that the device is very slippery. Carrying it without a case means only one thing - sooner or later, the smartphone will meet the asphalt.

There is water protection according to IP67 standard. They sacrificed a 3.5 mm audio jack and, of course, this is sad. Personally, I much prefer a standard audio output. Fiddling with adapters is not the future we all dream of.

Since we have glass, not metal, on the back, it is logical to assume that the smartphone supports wireless charging. But it was not there! I placed the device on the Belkin platform, charging responded to the smartphone, but the latter still did not want to charge. We conclude that there is no wireless charging.

What to buy instead of the Huawei Matepad 10.4 tablet

At the time of writing the review, the Huawei Matepad 10.4 tablet, or rather its version with LTE support, was sold for 23,999 rubles, and for that kind of money it is difficult to find something with the same powerful hardware, support for 4G networks and the current version of Android.

There is, of course, a slightly more expensive Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite , if not fundamentally the presence of LTE, but its processor is much weaker, and it also has fewer speakers and microphones, and there is no flash for the rear camera. But there is a stylus included, a gyroscope, a separate 3.5 mm jack, a metal case and support for Google services, which Huawei is deprived of due to sanctions.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite

Fans of Apple and their operating system can also take a closer look at the Apple iPad 2020 32 GB , and I would highlight the presence of a gyroscope, a fingerprint scanner, a 3.5 mm jack, and, again, a metal case, while in other functions the tablet is inferior to the hero of the review , at least according to performance characteristics.

Apple iPad 2020 32 Gb

But what stands out the most is the Huawei MediaPad M6 (10 inches), which has almost all the advantages of the previously mentioned models, except perhaps the stylus and Google services - in my opinion, this is the best option for its price if LTE is not needed.

Huawei MediaPad M6

Autonomy

A battery with a capacity of 4,000 mAh is installed inside. This is an average figure, but taking into account good software optimization, the smartphone can easily last one day on a single charge. The screen glow time with auto brightness set is an average of 4.5 hours.

Supports proprietary fast charging SuperCharge. It charges the device with a current of up to 5 amperes (at 4.5 volts). In real life, all this is converted into 60% charge only in the first half hour, in 1 hour the smartphone is charged 90%, and the battery reaches its full capacity in 1 hour 25 minutes. At the same time, Huawei boasts that their type of charging is one of the safest in the world, has been tested many times in laboratory conditions and all that. I willingly believe it!

Rest

While all other smartphones are dragging something out with the new Android, Mate 10 is already quietly working on “Oreo cookies” (version 8.0.0).

Are there any glitches, slowdowns or lags? Not at all.

In two weeks of active use, the smartphone never became dull, not a single application crashed (even Instagram), not a single animation slowed down - in general, everything was set up perfectly.

The proprietary shell has a dark theme - what is needed to save energy when the smartphone has an OLED screen. By the way, the Always on Display function (similar to Samsung and LG) is present here. In standby mode, the time and date are displayed on the screen. Unfortunately, you cannot configure this option as you wish.

The device supports connection to a monitor via DisplayPort 1.2 (you need a compatible cable, which is not included). In this mode, the smartphone is transformed into a computer with an interface familiar to PC users: Explorer, applications in a menu similar to “Start”, and so on. Overall, this is a clear answer to Samsung's DeX dock.

As for the sound quality, everything is fine with it. This is true both for the sound in headphones and in relation to external speakers.

There is a stereo effect, but it is minimal, because although the earpiece tries to echo the main one, it doesn’t do it very well.

The main speaker is located next to the USB C port and boasts quite loud and clear sound.

Rating
( 2 ratings, average 4.5 out of 5 )
Did you like the article? Share with friends:
For any suggestions regarding the site: [email protected]
Для любых предложений по сайту: [email protected]